本文介绍了非常有趣的GC讨论的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

有关垃圾收集的comp.lang.c ++

中有一个非常有趣的帖子。


比较讨论的水平是非常有益的

我们在comp.lang.c中讨论了这个问题


讨论被称为

"准确,暂停& C ++的确定性GC


起始消息的消息ID是:

< 80 ********** ************************@s8g2000prg.g ooglegroups.com>

-

jacob navia

jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr

logiciels / informatique

There is a very interesting thread in comp.lang.c++
about garbage collection.

It is very instructive to compare the level of the discussion
there with the discussion we just had here in comp.lang.c

The discussion is called
"An accurate, pauseless & deterministic GC for C++"

The message id of the starting message is:
<80**********************************@s8g2000prg.g ooglegroups.com>
--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32

推荐答案



大部分线程似乎都是关于
$适用性的争论b $ b表示GC申请专利。只有几个帖子实际讨论技术

方面。


< snip>

Most of that thread seems to an argument over the applicability of the
said GC for patenting. Only a few posts actually discuss the technical
aspects.

<snip>




但是,虽然我不太了解C ++,但我确实知道那里

不是_standard_的垃圾收集malloc包C.这是关于主题的
。可能的主题新闻组包括comp.lang.c ++和

comp.compilers.lcc。


-

Chuck F(cbfalconer)在maineline dot net)

< http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>

尝试下载部分。


-

通过

However, while I don''t really know about C++, I do know that there
is no garbage collecting malloc package for _standard_ C. This is
off topic. Possible topical newsgroups include comp.lang.c++ and
comp.compilers.lcc.

--
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com




但是,虽然我不太了解C ++,但我确实知道那里有

不是_standard_的垃圾收集malloc包C.这是关于主题的
。可能的主题新闻组包括comp.lang.c ++和

comp.compilers.lcc。


However, while I don''t really know about C++, I do know that there
is no garbage collecting malloc package for _standard_ C. This is
off topic. Possible topical newsgroups include comp.lang.c++ and
comp.compilers.lcc.



不是comp.lang.c ++。


如果是comp.std.c那将是热门话题建议的修改

标准。

Not comp.lang.c++.

It would be topical on comp.std.c if it is to be a proposed modification
to the Standard.


这篇关于非常有趣的GC讨论的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!

10-11 10:52