本文介绍了响应设计的范围是否值得考虑到2013年的IE8?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

限时删除!!

我仍然在这里看到关于为IE8做出响应式设计工作的问题,或者上帝禁止IE7。



由于缺乏Windows相关设备的知识,想到的是,它不值得为IE8实施响应式设计,因为今天仍然运行IE8的移动设备的数量不大。并且只为这个特定的浏览器留下静态的1024x768网站,因为有很少或没有理由响应的设计,与额外的痛苦的努力它需要和媒体查询polyfills的限制,如果超过95%的IE8剩余的浏览器份额只能在安全假定为1024以上屏幕宽度的桌面上运行。



如果卷仍然相关,哪个移动平台仍然使用IE8浏览器,设计方法。请分享有用的相关链接。



PS:上下文仅使用标准模式,不包括在兼容性视图或怪癖模式中使用IE。



$

b $ b

没有已知的有效平板电脑或手机使用IE8,我可以告诉。事件最早的Windows Phone使用IE9引擎。因此,笔记本电脑被排除在外,IE8不被智能移动设备使用。



根据3个客户网站的w3counter,statcounter和分析,2013年3月基于美国网站的IE8浏览器份额介于5%和11%之间。



根据我研究的3个不同的美国网站,使用屏幕分辨率为800x600像素或更小的IE8用户数量在0.6%和IE8用户总数的1%。与去年雅各布·尼尔森(Jakob Nielsen)观察到的台式机和笔记本电脑的小屏幕变得越来越少的趋势一致:



截至今日,这带来了平均预期,屏幕尺寸为800x600或更小的整体IE8用户大约为0.05%,如果我们包括IE7,则最大为0.1%;这低于美国的整体IE6使用率,根据ie6countdown.com


$ b

为0.2%。因此,为了IE7,响应设计兼容性要求低于IE9, IE8用户是值得的,如果不需要任何后续的努力。



如果包括媒体查询polyfill或使用Bootstrap使它立即工作,那么伟大。但是它绝对不值得超过几个小时的时间处理众多潜在的错误(谷歌搜索bootstrap ie8说的体积),因为它不再是值得让网站完全IE6兼容。



只要网站在固定设计的IE8工作,这可能更容易实现,而不是试图痛苦地使其响应IE8 / IE7,从今天就足够了。


I still see questions here that pertain to making responsive design work for IE8, or god forbid, IE7.

For lack of knowledge of Windows related devices, my immediate thought is that, it would not be worth implementing responsive design for IE8 due to the insignificant amount of mobile devices that would still run IE8 today. And just leave sites as static 1024x768 for this particular browser, as there is little to no reason for responsive design, with the extra painful efforts it requires and the limitation of media query polyfills, if over 95% of the remaining browser share of IE8 is only run on desktops with a safely assumed 1024+ screen width.

If the volume is still relevant, which mobile platform still use IE8 browsers, that would necessitate or justify a responsive design approach for them. Please share useful relevant links.

PS: The context is only using standard mode, excluding using IE in compatibility view or quirk mode.

解决方案

So after investigation, I am going to answer my own question with a few relevant stats which is what I was looking for:

No known active tablets or mobile phone use IE8 as far I can tell. Event the earliest Windows Phones uses the IE9 engine. So, laptops excluded, IE8 is not used by 'smart' mobile devices.

According to w3counter, statcounter and analytics from 3 client sites, the IE8 browser share in March 2013, based on US sites, is between 5% and 11%. An 8% average.

The number of IE8 users using screen resolutions of 800x600 pixels or less today, as per the 3 different US based sites I studied, is between 0.6% and 1% of the total IE8 user base. Being in line with the trends observed by Jakob Nielsen last year that "small screens for desktop and laptop computers are getting rare" falling to 1% levels: http://www.nngroup.com/articles/computer-screens-getting-bigger/

As of today, that brings an average expectation that the overall IE8 users with a screen size of 800x600 or less, is roughly 0.05%, with a maximum of 0.1% if we include IE7; which is lower than the overall IE6 usage in the US, being at 0.2% according to ie6countdown.com

So the responsive design compatibility requirement below IE9 for the sake of IE7 and IE8 users is only worth should it not require any consequential effort.

If including a media queries polyfill or using Bootstrap makes it works right away, then great. But it's definitely not worth more than a few hours of time dealing with the numerous potential bugs (a Google search for "bootstrap ie8" speaks volume on that), just as it's no longer worth making sites fully IE6 compatible.

As long as the site works in IE8 with a fixed design, which may easier to implement rather than trying to painfully make it responsive for IE8/IE7, it is sufficient as of today.

这篇关于响应设计的范围是否值得考虑到2013年的IE8?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!

1403页,肝出来的..

09-06 12:18