Net6 Configuration & Options 源码分析 Part2 Options

第二部分主要记录Options 模型
OptionsConfigurationServiceCollectionExtensions类提供了对Options 模型配置系统的Configure方法的扩展

1. 直接使用Options

直接使用Options

在Starup ConfigService中经常会看到把一个拉姆达注册成配置项例如:.Configure<Profile>(it ->it.age = 18),我们称这个拉姆达为Configure Action,其实这是使用了一个包装类,包装你的Configure Action委托,并把这个类的实例注册到Service容器中。它实现IOptions与拉姆达如何映射的,这一切由OptionsServiceCollectionExtensionsOptionsFacotry等实现的。你也可以直接像下面这样使用

var profile = new Servicecollection ().Addoptions().Configure<Profile>(it ->it.age = 18).BuildServiceProvider().GetRequiredService<IOptions<Profile>>().Value;

配置服务注册源码分析/Configure Action包装类的注册

OptionsServiceCollectionExtensions 作为配置服务的扩展类下面有三种类型的扩展方法分别是Configure、PostConfigure、AddOptions,前两所对应的服务为IConfigureOptions与IPostConfigureOptions 区别仅仅是为了实现配置Configure Action的执行时机,IPostConfigureOptions会后执行,而AddOptions本质上还是注册前两种,注册成面上看起来AddOptions注册的Configure Action具有了参数可以访问其它DI内服务。
注意:就算你使用了三个注册方式注册一次或多次对同一个TOptions进行注册,他们其实是操作的同一个TOptions给你。这体现在OptionsFactory.Create上,也是我们想要的效果。

以下代码为Configure、PostConfigure的服务注册逻辑。

Configure、PostConfigure、扩展方法注册的 Configure Action会由IConfigureOptions与IPostConfigureOptions 接口对应的包装类进行包装。属性均是Action,Configure Action的执行是在Configure方法中。IConfigureOptions

Configure -> ConfigureNamedOptions
PostConfigure -> PostConfigureOptions

public static class OptionsServiceCollectionExtensions
{
    ...
   public static IServiceCollection Configure<TOptions>(this IServiceCollection services!!, string? name, Action<TOptions> configureOptions!!)
            where TOptions : class
    {
        services.AddOptions();
        services.AddSingleton<IConfigureOptions<TOptions>>(new ConfigureNamedOptions<TOptions>(name, configureOptions));
        return services;
    }

    public static IServiceCollection PostConfigure<TOptions>(this IServiceCollection services!!, string? name, Action<TOptions> configureOptions!!)
    where TOptions : class
    {
        services.AddOptions();
        services.AddSingleton<IPostConfigureOptions<TOptions>>(new PostConfigureOptions<TOptions>(name, configureOptions));
        return services;
    }
    ...
}
public class ConfigureNamedOptions<TOptions> : IConfigureNamedOptions<TOptions> where TOptions : class
{
    public ConfigureNamedOptions(string? name, Action<TOptions>? action)
    {
        Name = name;
        Action = action;
    }
    public virtual void Configure(string? name, TOptions options!!)
    {
        // Null name is used to configure all named options.// Name的过滤以及Configure 逻辑就是在这里体现的
        if (Name == null || name == Name)
        {
            Action?.Invoke(options);
        }
    }
}
public class PostConfigureOptions<TOptions> : IPostConfigureOptions<TOptions> where TOptions : class
{
    public PostConfigureOptions(string? name, Action<TOptions>? action)
    {
        Name = name;
        Action = action;
    }

    public virtual void PostConfigure(string? name, TOptions options!!)
    {
        if (Name == null || name == Name)
        {
            Action?.Invoke(options);
        }
    }
}

以下代码为AddOptions 的服务注册逻辑。
public static class OptionsServiceCollectionExtensions
{
    ...
    public static OptionsBuilder<TOptions> AddOptions<TOptions>(this IServiceCollection services!!, string? name)
        where TOptions : class
    {
        services.AddOptions();
        return new OptionsBuilder<TOptions>(services, name);
    }
    ...
}

public class OptionsBuilder<TOptions> where TOptions : class
{
    ...
    public virtual OptionsBuilder<TOptions> Configure<TDep>(Action<TOptions, TDep> configureOptions!!) where TDep : class
    {
        Services.AddTransient<IConfigureOptions<TOptions>>(sp =>
            new ConfigureNamedOptions<TOptions, TDep>(Name, sp.GetRequiredService<TDep>(), configureOptions));
        return this;
    }
    ...
}

public class ConfigureNamedOptions<TOptions, TDep> : IConfigureNamedOptions<TOptions> {
    ...
    public ConfigureNamedOptions(string? name, TDep dependency, Action<TOptions, TDep>? action)
    {
        Name = name;
        Action = action;
        Dependency = dependency;
    }

    public virtual void Configure(string? name, TOptions options!!)
    {
        // Null name is used to configure all named options.
        if (Name == null || name == Name)
        {
            Action?.Invoke(options, Dependency);
        }
    }
    ...
}

总结

注入到服务的扩展方法(OptionsServiceCollectionExtensions)服务类服务实现类使用生命周期备注ConfigureIConfigureOptionsConfigureNamedOptions被OptonsFactory使用SingletonConfigureAll,在IPostConfigureOptions前执行Configure ActionPostConfigureIPostConfigureOptionsPostConfigureOptions被OptonsFactory使用SingletonConfigureAll 在IConfigureOptions后执行Configure ActionAddOptionsIConfigureOptions/IPostConfigureOptionsConfigureNamedOptions/PostConfigureOptions被OptonsFactory使用Singleton辅助注入一个可以访问其它服务的Configure Action

配置Otpns服务的使用

首先在固有想法上注入的服务直接会拿来使用。而在这里注入的均为IConfigureOptions/IPostConfigureOptions服务我们管他们叫Configure Action的包装类,而要使用这些服务是通过IOptions/IOptionsSnapshot/IOptionsMonitor去获得。我们称这三个服务为OptionsManger类

注册的基础服务(OptionsServiceCollectionExtensions.AddOptions)

这里整理出来IOptions/IOptionsSnapshot/IOptionsMonitor三种OptionsManger的区别。
服务类|服务实现类|使用|生命周期|备注|
---|:--😐:--😐:--😐:--😐--:
IOptions|UnnamedOptionsManager|直接在DI|Singleton|在应用启动后读取配置数据且配置更新后获取不到新的变更。实现逻辑:直接调用OptionsFactory.Create(Options.DefaultName)拿到所有Configure Action的包装类 执行包装类配置方法|
IOptionsSnapshot|OptionsManager|同上|Scoped:|区别,通过使用 IOptionsSnapshot,针对请求生存期访问和缓存选项时,每个请求都会计算一次选项。 当使用支持读取已更新的配置值的配置提供程序时,将在应用启动后读取对配置所做的更改。实现逻辑:用Factory创建完后得缓存下。非常的简单。|
IOptionsMonitor|OptionsMonitor|同上|Singleton|区别,当配置发生改变是由他提供的配置会实时更新。|

IOptions 使用Demo

var source = new Dictionary<string, string>{
    {"TestOptions:Key1" ,"TestOptions key1"},
};
var config = new ConfigurationBuilder().Add(new MemoryConfigurationSource() { InitialData = source }).Build();
ServiceCollection services = new ServiceCollection();
services.AddOptions();
services.Configure<TestOptions>(config.GetSection("TestOptions")); // Import the "Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions" package.
var serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
IOptions<TestOptions> options = serviceProvider.GetService<IOptions<TestOptions>>();
Console.WriteLine(options.Value.Key1);
Console.ReadLine();
public class TestOptions
{
    public string Key1 { get; set; }
}

IOptions 使用源码分析

以第一个为例:UnnamedOptionsManager 的value属性的get 访问器其内部直接调用OptionsFactory.Craete Create就更简单了。构造方法就把所有的 IConfigureOptions/IPostConfigureOptions拿到了。直接循环两个集合,并调用Configure方法就Ok了 Caonfigure内部执行注入的Action 对TOptions实例一顿操作。

internal sealed class UnnamedOptionsManager<[DynamicallyAccessedMembers(Options.DynamicallyAccessedMembers)] TOptions> : IOptions<TOptions>where TOptions : class
    {
        private volatile TOptions? _value;
        public UnnamedOptionsManager(IOptionsFactory<TOptions> factory) => _factory = factory;
        public TOptions Value
        {
            get
            {
                if (_value is TOptions value)
                {
                    return value;
                }
                return _value ??= _factory.Create(Options.DefaultName);
            }
        }
    }
public class OptionsFactory<[DynamicallyAccessedMembers(Options.DynamicallyAccessedMembers)] TOptions> :
    IOptionsFactory<TOptions>
    where TOptions : class
{
    ...

    public TOptions Create(string name)
    {
        // 创建Toptions 实例对象
        TOptions options = CreateInstance(name);
        // 依次调用注册的 Configure Action
        // 先执行IConfigureOptions包装的Configure Action.
        foreach (IConfigureOptions<TOptions> setup in _setups)
        {
            if (setup is IConfigureNamedOptions<TOptions> namedSetup)
            {
                namedSetup.Configure(name, options);
            }
            else if (name == Options.DefaultName)
            {
                setup.Configure(options);
            }
        }
        // 在执行 IPostConfigureOptions包装的Configure Action.
        foreach (IPostConfigureOptions<TOptions> post in _postConfigures)
        {
            post.PostConfigure(name, options);
        }
        // 执行验证逻辑
        if (_validations.Length > 0)
        {
            var failures = new List<string>();
            foreach (IValidateOptions<TOptions> validate in _validations)
            {
                ValidateOptionsResult result = validate.Validate(name, options);
                if (result is not null && result.Failed)
                {
                    failures.AddRange(result.Failures);
                }
            }
            if (failures.Count > 0)
            {
                throw new OptionsValidationException(name, typeof(TOptions), failures);
            }
        }

        return options;
    }
    ...
}

IOptionsSnapshot 使用Demo

因实现逻辑基本与IOptons相同这里就不多做记录。

var source = new Dictionary<string, string>{
    {"TestOptions:Key1" ,"TestOptions key1"},
};
var config = new ConfigurationBuilder().Add(new MemoryConfigurationSource() { InitialData = source }).Build();
ServiceCollection services = new ServiceCollection();
services.AddOptions();
services.Configure<TestOptions>("TestOptions", config.GetSection("TestOptions")); // Import the "Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions" package.
var serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
IOptionsSnapshot<TestOptions> optionsAccessor = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptionsSnapshot<TestOptions>>();
Console.WriteLine(optionsAccessor.Get("TestOptions").Key1);
Console.ReadLine();
public class TestOptions
{
    public string Key1 { get; set; }
}

配置源的同步 IOptionsMonitor 的使用 Demo

源码在part3 单独分析。

var configuration = new ConfigurationBuilder().AddJsonFile(path: "profile.json",
                                                           optional: false,
                                                           reloadOnChange: true).Build();
new ServiceCollection().AddOptions().Configure<Profile>(configuration).BuildServiceProvider().GetRequiredService<IOptionsMonitor<Profile>>().OnChange(profile => Console.WriteLine($"changed: {profile.Age}"));
Console.Read();

public class Profile
{
    public int Age { get; set; }
}

"Options模型"“配置系统”结合。

2. 将配置绑定为Options对象

如下两个demo分别演示了"Options模型"“配置系统”结合的结合使用。
Demo1

var configuration = new ConfigurationBuilder ().AddJsonFile ("profile.json").Build ();
var profile = new ServiceCollection().AddOptions().Configure<Profile>(configuration).BuildServiceProvider().GetRequiredService<IOptions<Profile>>().Value;

Demo2

var source = new Dictionary<string, string>{
    {"TestOptions:Key1" ,"TestOptions key1"},
    {"TestOptions:Key2" ,"TestOptions key2"},
    {"UserInfo:key1" ,"UserInfo"},
};

var config = new ConfigurationBuilder().Add(new MemoryConfigurationSource() { InitialData = source }).Build();
ServiceCollection services = new ServiceCollection();
services.AddOptions();
services.Configure<TestOpetion>(config.GetSection("TestOptions")); // Import the "Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions" package.
var serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
var options = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<TestOpetion>>();
Console.WriteLine(options.Value.Key1);
Console.ReadLine();
public class TestOpetion{
    public string Key1{ get; set; }
    public string Key2 { get; set; }
}

以上操作步骤为OptionsConfigurationServiceCollectionExtensions类定义了对 Configure的扩展,有三个参数string name、config(IConfiguration),configureBinder的委托,第一个参数是TOptions的name, 第二个表示配置系统的IConfiguration,第三个configureBinder 是配置系统在映射Toptions时候的一些配置

原理很简单,因为有了ServiceCollection的支持,那么就往里面帮我们注入一个类型为IConfigureOptions 实际为new NamedConfigureFromConfigurationOptions的类。那么NamedConfigureFromConfigurationOptions类构造函数里面直接把BindFromOptions方法作为Configure Action传给父类ConfigureNamedOptions 也就是说此类是帮我们提供了一个调用了configureBinder的Configure Action。(config.Bind(options, configureBinder)这个Bing是扩展方法,ConfigurationBinder是个帮助类)。这样看来NamedConfigureFromConfigurationOptions唯一的作用就是帮帮我们组织了一个Configure Action免得你去自己写了。
关于configureBinder基本逻辑基本是根据TOptions的Type 对象反射出信息,然后第二个参数config(配置系统提供数据的接口)拿数据,在把对应的数据绑定在TOptions 对象上。

public static IServiceCollection Configure<[DynamicallyAccessedMembers(DynamicallyAccessedMemberTypes.All)] TOptions>(this IServiceCollection services!!, string? name, IConfiguration config!!, Action<BinderOptions>? configureBinder)
    where TOptions : class
{
    services.AddOptions();
    // 用于支持**“配置系统”**与 **"Options模型"**结合后当配置系统发生更新时回调options时注册的回调函数。后面会说到
    services.AddSingleton<IOptionsChangeTokenSource<TOptions>>(new ConfigurationChangeTokenSource<TOptions>(name, config));
    // 注册NamedConfigureFromConfigurationOptions
    return services.AddSingleton<IConfigureOptions<TOptions>>(new NamedConfigureFromConfigurationOptions<TOptions>(name, config, configureBinder));
}

    /// Configures an option instance by using <see cref="ConfigurationBinder.Bind(IConfiguration, object)"/> against an <see cref="IConfiguration"/>.
    public class NamedConfigureFromConfigurationOptions<TOptions> : ConfigureNamedOptions<TOptions> where TOptions : class
    {
        public NamedConfigureFromConfigurationOptions(string? name, IConfiguration config!!, Action<BinderOptions>? configureBinder)
            : base(name, options => BindFromOptions(options, config, configureBinder)){
        }

        private static void BindFromOptions(TOptions options, IConfiguration config, Action<BinderOptions>? configureBinder) => config.Bind(options, configureBinder);
    }

    public class BinderOptions
    {
        // true 会对TOptons的私有属性也赋值
        public bool BindNonPublicProperties { get; set; }

        public bool ErrorOnUnknownConfiguration { get; set; }
    }

验证Options的有效性

Options 扩展方法注册Microsoft.Extensions.Options向Service容器注入认证服务,其原理是OptionsFactory.Create拿到所有注入的服务。将TOptons作为参数传入实例的验证方法。

services.AddOptions<DateTimeFormatOptions>().Configure(options =>options. DatePattern = datePattern;options.TimePattern = timePattern;).Validate(options => Validate (options.DatePattern) && Validate(options. TimePattern), "Invalid Date or Time pattern.");

其它

OptionsServiceCollectionExtensions Options 模型依赖的服务

public static IServiceCollection AddOptions(this IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.TryAdd(ServiceDescriptor.Singleton(typeof(IOptions<>), typeof(UnnamedOptionsManager<>)));
    services.TryAdd(ServiceDescriptor.Scoped(typeof(IOptionsSnapshot<>), typeof(OptionsManager<>)));
    services.TryAdd(ServiceDescriptor.Singleton(typeof(IOptionsMonitor<>), typeof(OptionsMonitor<>)));
    services.TryAdd(ServiceDescriptor.Transient(typeof(IOptionsFactory<>), typeof(OptionsFactory<>)));
    services.TryAdd(ServiceDescriptor.Singleton(typeof(IOptionsMonitorCache<>), typeof(OptionsCache<>)));
}

文章中提到的代码,请在source.dot.net快速搜索预览


本文来自博客园,作者:一身大膘,转载请注明原文链接:https://www.cnblogs.com/hts92/p/15927329.html

如果该篇文章对您有帮助的话,可以点一下右下角的【推荐】

03-21 10:16