问题描述
在下面的代码中,已经调用了 amethod
。在什么点/行是最初由 myObject
引用的对象,符合垃圾收集条件?
class Test {
private Object classObject;
public void amethod(){
Object myObject = new Object();
classObject = myObject;
myObject = null;
如果 classObject
或
amethod
有一个public,protected,default或static的访问修饰符,它会影响对象符合垃圾收集的条件吗?如果是这样,它将如何受到影响?
classObject = myObject;
会被优化,并且 myObject = null;
是符合垃圾收集条件的点。 该对象不会成为垃圾收集的候选人,直到全部引用它为止。 Java对象是通过引用分配的,所以当你有
classObject = myObject;
您将另一个引用指派给堆上的同一对象。所以这一行
myObject = null;
只能删除一个引用。要使 myObject
成为垃圾收集的候选者,您必须具有
classObject = null;
In the code below, given that amethod
has been called. At what point/line is the Object originally referenced by myObject
, eligible for Garbage Collection?
class Test {
private Object classObject;
public void amethod() {
Object myObject = new Object();
classObject = myObject;
myObject = null;
}
}
And if classObject
or amethod
had an access modifier of public, protected, default or static, would it affect what point the Object is eligible for Garbage Collection? If so, how would it be affected?
- My first thought is that the Object is eligible for Garbage Collection when the Test object is eligible for Garbage Collection.
- But then again. The optimizer may know that the classObject is never read from in which case
classObject = myObject;
would be optimized out andmyObject = null;
is the point it is eligible for Garbage Collection.
The object will not become a candidate for garbage collection until all references to it are discarded. Java objects are assigned by reference so when you had
classObject = myObject;
You assigned another reference to the same object on the heap. So this line
myObject = null;
Only gets rid of one reference. To make myObject
a candidate for garbage collection, you have to have
classObject = null;
这篇关于什么时候该对象符合垃圾收集要求?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!