动态生成html vs使用html脚手架？

Faisal Vali，MD，MSc Loyola放射肿瘤学 伊利诺伊州芝加哥 解决方案 Faisal Valiaécrit： 是否有人使用的指导方针可帮助他们决定何时更好地动态生成？b $ b所有html元素使用javascript 与实际编写一些html并将其用作脚手架？ 唯一的方法是代码： - 全部用html， 最终用css， 格外有少量图像 - 为一些非常有用的动态添加JS，而不是更多 我一直在使用extjs框架（我没看到这个库 这个奇妙的extjs是什么？ 它离开哪里？ 即：看到 < http://www.extendersamples.qsh.eu/> -886 KB（ 1252 KB未压缩）只是为了一个表:-( 或...这应该是一种插件的impla示例： http://www.siteartwork.de/livegrid_demo/ --1154 KB： - （:-(（只是为了排序表？） 在这个论坛上批评很多 - 不像原型，jquery和dojo 也许是因为它不太知名或使用过？ 非常感谢你的想法。 我从原则开始，必须显示和阅读页面 没有JS ... :-( b $ b - sm SAM写道： Faisal Valiaécrit： >人们使用的指南是否有助于他们决定什么时候使用动态生成所有html元素更好？ javascript 与实际编写一些html并将其用作脚手架？ 唯一的方法是编码： - 全部在html， 最终有了css， 格外有几张图片 - 为一些非常有用的动态添加JS，而不是更多 也许不是*唯一的*编码方式，但肯定是一套合理的 原则。 >我一直在使用extjs框架（我没看到这个库 这个奇妙的extjs是什么？ 它在哪里离开？ ie：看到 < http://www.extendersamples.qsh.eu/> -886 KB（1252 KB未压缩）仅适用于桌子:-( 你知道，我必须承认我认为你是不诚实的我读这篇文章的时候是。我去了网站，看到了962KB（由 Firebug报道）。 我想：好吧它一定主要是在图形中......不是所以： HTML：22KB CSS：207KB JS：705KB 图片：15KB XHR：15KB Jinkies！ 或......应该是什么一种插件的示例： http：//www.siteartwork。 de / livegrid_demo / --1154 KB :-(（:-(（只是为了排序表？） 并且，如果我可以：Yowser！ Dan Rumney写道： SAM写道： > Faisal Vali a ??暴击： >>是否有任何指导人用它来帮助他们决定什么时候更好动态使用javascript生成所有html元素与实际编写一些html并将其用作脚手架？ 唯一的方法是编码： - 全部用html，最终用css，特别用几张图片 - 添加JS对于一些非常有用的动力，而不是更多 也许不是*唯一的*代码方式，但肯定是一套合理的 开始的原则。 我的第二个。 > ie：看到了< http://www.extendersamples.qsh.eu/> -886 KB（1252 KB未压缩）仅用于表:-( 没有TABLE元素，它由DIV元素组成。 [...]我去了网站，看到了962KB（由 Firebug报告）。 我想：好吧，它必须主要在图形中......不是这样的： HTML：22KB CSS：207KB JS：705KB 图片：15KB XHR：15KB Jinkies！ >或者......本来应该是一个impla的例子插件类型： http://www.siteartwork.de/livegrid_demo/ --1154 KB： - （：:-(（只是为了对桌子进行排序） e？） 如果我可以：Yowser！ 但是，对于脚本来说，如果有能力的人写了它（或代码生成的话），那么足迹可能会大大减少 it）。例如，ExtJs示例中的代码包括 函数Sys Are there any guidelines people use that help them decide when it isbetter to dynamically generate all html elements using javascriptversus actually writing some html and using it as scaffolding?I have been using the extjs framework ( I haven''t see this librarycritiqued much on this forum - unlike prototype, jquery and dojo whichthe regulars here tend to eviscerate - unless i''ve missed somethreads, which is quite possible) and it allows both mechanisms forall its widgets and layouts. But i''m not sure what the pros and consare to either approach. Obviously if you don''t have access to thehtml page then your options are limited.Anyway, I was planning on posting this within the extjs forums (and Istill might if it doesn''t spark much of a response here), but thenthought that this was more of a general javascript/style question andso have posted this here.Would really appreciate your thoughts.Thanks,Faisal Vali, MD, MScLoyola Radiation OncologyChicago, IL 解决方案 Faisal Vali a écrit :Are there any guidelines people use that help them decide when it isbetter to dynamically generate all html elements using javascriptversus actually writing some html and using it as scaffolding?The only way is to code :- all in html,eventually with css,exceptionally with few images- adding JS for some non really useful dynamism, not moreI have been using the extjs framework ( I haven''t see this libraryand what is this marvelous extjs ?where does it leave ?ie : seen that<http://www.extendersamples.qsh.eu/>-886 KB (1252 KB uncompressed) just for a table :-(or ... what is supposed to be a impla example of a kind of plugin : http://www.siteartwork.de/livegrid_demo/--1154 KB :-( :-( (just to sort a table ?)critiqued much on this forum - unlike prototype, jquery and dojoPerhaps because it is less well known or used ?Would really appreciate your thoughts.As I start from principle that a page must be displayed and readablewithout JS ... :-(--smSAM wrote:Faisal Vali a écrit :>Are there any guidelines people use that help them decide when it isbetter to dynamically generate all html elements using javascriptversus actually writing some html and using it as scaffolding?The only way is to code :- all in html, eventually with css, exceptionally with few images- adding JS for some non really useful dynamism, not morePerhaps not the *only* way to code, but certainly a sensible set ofprinciples to begin with.>I have been using the extjs framework ( I haven''t see this libraryand what is this marvelous extjs ?where does it leave ?ie : seen that<http://www.extendersamples.qsh.eu/>-886 KB (1252 KB uncompressed) just for a table :-(You know, I have to admit that I thought you were being disingenuous atfirst when I read this. I went to the site and saw 962KB (as reported byFirebug).I thought: well it must be mainly in the graphics... not so:HTML: 22KBCSS:207KBJS:705KBImages: 15KBXHR: 15KBJinkies!or ... what is supposed to be a impla example of a kind of plugin : http://www.siteartwork.de/livegrid_demo/--1154 KB :-( :-( (just to sort a table ?)And, if I may: Yowser! Dan Rumney wrote:SAM wrote:>Faisal Vali a ??crit :>>Are there any guidelines people use that help them decide when it isbetter to dynamically generate all html elements using javascriptversus actually writing some html and using it as scaffolding?The only way is to code :- all in html, eventually with css, exceptionally with few images- adding JS for some non really useful dynamism, not morePerhaps not the *only* way to code, but certainly a sensible set ofprinciples to begin with.I second that.>ie : seen that<http://www.extendersamples.qsh.eu/>-886 KB (1252 KB uncompressed) just for a table :-(There is no TABLE element, it is composed of DIV elements.[...] I went to the site and saw 962KB (as reported byFirebug).I thought: well it must be mainly in the graphics... not so:HTML: 22KBCSS:207KBJS:705KBImages: 15KBXHR: 15KBJinkies!>or ... what is supposed to be a impla example of a kind of plugin :http://www.siteartwork.de/livegrid_demo/--1154 KB :-( :-( (just to sort a table ?)And, if I may: Yowser!However, as for the scripts the footprint could have been considerablysmaller if a competent person would have written it (or the code generatingit). For example, the code in the ExtJs example includesfunction Sys 这篇关于动态生成html vs使用html脚手架？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！